The initial five works for me. I see no reason to add more at this time. It would only be a block for graduation, not inception.
To rephrase: some may have an issue with five, but I bet you'll get enough +1 votes as-is. Cheers, -g On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 6:39 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it just because that it will spend more time... > > So what is the suggested initial committer number for NuttX? We can try to > get even more but is this necessary? The plan is to expand the committers > quickly during the incubation time, follow the Apache way, and also the > IPMCs can observe whether there are problems when electing new committers. > > Thanks. > > Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@gmail.com>于2019年12月2日 周一07:56写道： > > > Hi, > > Given I assume there are other contributors why not make them initial > > commitors? > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > > On Mon, 2 Dec 2019, 10:45 Duo Zhang, <zhang...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > The proposal on the wiki page has already listed five initial > committers. > > > > > > And I think we can let the initial committers reply here to confirm > that > > > they will be active, at least in the early time in the incubator, > before > > we > > > elect new PPMC members. > > > > > > Does this solve your concerns? Thanks Dave. > > > > > > Dave Fisher <wave4d...@comcast.net>于2019年12月2日 周一01:38写道： > > > > > > > I share Ted’s concerns. > > > > > > > > It would help if the initial committer list was greater than the bare > > > > minimum of three. Three PPMC members is not enough. There needs to be > > at > > > > least five committers to start. > > > > > > > > (Should there be an explicit minimum in the proposal template?) > > > > > > > > It’s often the case that some initial committers do not actually > > > > transition to the incubating podling. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > > On Dec 1, 2019, at 9:16 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I doubt that the name is the crucial issue. I would see that have > a > > > > > substantial group of initial committers who are active in setting > up > > > > there > > > > > project would be the crucial step. That doesn't have to happen > before > > > > > incubation. > > > > > > > > > > As a thought experiment, if Greg could go on a disconnected > vacation > > > > right > > > > > now without messing up the move to Apache, I would have no worries. > > > That > > > > is > > > > > almost certainly not true, but it can serve to illuminate the > factors > > > > that > > > > > make it not true. Is the decision-making centralized? Are there > > > > problematic > > > > > thoughts about retaining a high bar to committee status? Do > community > > > > > members automatically defer to Greg rather than move forward on > > > > decisions? > > > > > Are non-coders excluded from committer status? > > > > > > > > > > I don't know the answers to these questions, but I have a very > strong > > > > > expectation that this will be harder to address than expected so it > > is > > > > > really good that this has already been identified and there are > some > > > > > actions in progress. The only thing I can really add is that the > > > > community > > > > > members probably don't yet know how big a deal this will be and the > > > > Apache > > > > > folks probably assume more cultural transfer than has actually > > > happened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019, 11:43 PM Justin Mclean < > > > jus...@classsoftware.com> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> > > > > >>> Having a project that seems to have the name of a prominent > > community > > > > >>> member seems to pose a risk that there is a benevolent dictator > > > pattern > > > > >> at > > > > >>> work here. > > > > >> > > > > >> Greg is aware of the “no dictators rule" and has already answered > > this > > > > in > > > > >> this thread. He willing to hand over responsibilities to the wider > > > > >> community and give up his trademark. > > > > >> > > > > >> Do you think it would be a good idea to change the name of the > > > project? > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > >> Justin > > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
