On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:28, Vladimir Bossicard wrote: > > god no. The avalon group was already using a facade logger long before > > commons was for much the same reason commons adopted one. > > Is Avalon still using its own facade logger or changed to commons-logging?
its own. The commons logger does not support our use case. > I'm just wondering: How many Jakarta projects use this common-logging > package? What's the advantage of having a common logging package if > it's not widely used even within the Jakarta community? good question. It is used by struts and will soon be adopted by turbine I suspect and those two groups give the package wide-enough usage. > Another solution : drop one logger (don't shoot me!) and stand beside > the winner. Users willing to use Jakarta projects will *have* to use > the Jakarta logger. Sound M$-ish, doesn't it? Some people would like that ;) > Last solution : everyone stands where they are: pro-choice vs. > pro-one-logger. thats the only way forward. -- Cheers, Pete "There's a frood who really knows where his towel is." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
