<snip><snip>
I have been thinking about it, I do not think removing the offeding code is appropriate or sufficient.
If proven, I think offending devlopers, new or old should be baned from ASF (and other OSS projects) for a few years. The project should be parked. Let it live on SF, why shield it (becuase now ASF has to use their lawyers/resources)
ASF should publicly applogize, and as a sign of friendship with OSS, do something to help jBoss, such as help with J2EE certification, or help with code or something.
Did I say that Stein should be removed, as the person out of all the OSS projects out there, did most to ruin the high reputation, trough negligence or some other reason.
I feel dirty using Apache Struts today becuase of this mess. I already remvoed ASF licnese from basicPortal.sf.net when this was originaly done and uses a "commons" license or something like that.
Geezz relax Vic, we are talking about software here. It's no life and death matter. No one is going to lose their life over this. It's not like a U.S. gov. official leaking the name of a CIA operative to the public. Give me a break, it sounds like this is going to hit you personally in the pocketbook, I can not understand why you are so passionate about this. Why are you? Hummm.... could the real reason be that you are trying to pull a M$ and stifle any compentition with JBoss?? What is your real issue?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
