gentoo-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-php/pecl-idn dev-php/pecl-enchant Ole Markus With
• [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Sergei Trofimovich
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Markos Chandras
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Sergei Trofimovich
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Sergei Trofimovich
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Sergei Trofimovich
• [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Fabio Erculiani
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Fabio Erculiani
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Ian Stakenvicius
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Fabian Groffen
• [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-laptop/thinkpad app-laptop/tpctl app-laptop/configure-thinkpad Markos Chandras
• [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-shells/ksh Markos Chandras
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-shells/ksh Mike Gilbert
• [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/{libdsk,lib765} Markos Chandras
• [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Hilco Wijbenga
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? ross smith
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Matt Turner
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Zac Medico
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Hilco Wijbenga
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Markos Chandras
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Ryan Hill
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Hilco Wijbenga
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Zac Medico
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Ryan Hill
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Dale
• [gentoo-dev] tla.eclass is orphan Pacho Ramos
• [gentoo-dev] About masking net-misc/mDNSResponder for removal Pacho Ramos
• [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement Bernard Cafarelli
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement Michael Haubenwallner
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement Brian Dolbec
• [gentoo-dev] Understanding the LINGUAS variable and use-expand Mike Gilbert
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Understanding the LINGUAS variable and use-expand Mart Raudsepp
• [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net William Hubbs
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Zac Medico
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Alexandre Rostovtsev
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net William Hubbs
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Alexandre Rostovtsev
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Duncan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net William Hubbs
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Alexandre Rostovtsev
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Ian Stakenvicius
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net William Hubbs
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Alec Warner
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Duncan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Ian Stakenvicius
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net William Hubbs
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Alexandre Rostovtsev
• [gentoo-dev] news item: baselayout-1 deprecation William Hubbs
• [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-02-05 23h59 UTC Robin H. Johnson
• [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-kernel/kerneloops Markos Chandras
• [gentoo-dev] Lat rites: app-portage/autounmask Markos Chandras
• [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed: app-office/libreoffice, app-office/libreoffice-bin, app-office/libreoffice-l10n Andreas K. Huettel
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed: app-office/libreoffice, app-office/libreoffice-bin, app-office/libreoffice-l10n Pacho Ramos
• [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Markos Chandras
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Alec Warner
• [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/twiki Markos Chandras
  • [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/twiki Markos Chandras
• [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Alexandre Rostovtsev
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass and base.eclass integration Mike Frysinger
• [gentoo-dev] RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Nirbheek Chauhan
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Nirbheek Chauhan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Gilles Dartiguelongue
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Nirbheek Chauhan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Nirbheek Chauhan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Dan Douglas
• [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: FlowScan, CUFlow, and JKFlow Samuli Suominen
• [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? Sebastian Pipping
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? Alexandre Rostovtsev
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? ScytheMan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? Sebastian Pipping
• [gentoo-dev] Temporary help with my packages Stanislav Ochotnicky
• [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Ulrich Mueller
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Olivier Crête
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Cyprien Nicolas
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Samuli Suominen
• [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-01-29 23h59 UTC Robin H. Johnson
• [gentoo-dev] Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass Ulrich Mueller
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass Mike Frysinger
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass Duncan
• [gentoo-dev] app-laptop/thinkpad needs a new maintainer Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] app-laptop/thinkpad needs a new maintainer Ian Stakenvicius
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] app-laptop/thinkpad needs a new maintainer Andreas K. Huettel
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] app-laptop/thinkpad needs a new maintainer Markos Chandras
• [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by betelgeuse need a co-maintainer Pacho Ramos
• [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around Ryan Hill
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around Rich Freeman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around Donnie Berkholz
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Keeping older versions around »Q«
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around Graham Murray
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
• [gentoo-dev] [FYI] php-lib-r1.eclass going to die Matti Bickel
• [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: dev-db/pgaccess Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
• [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages Rich Freeman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages Markos Chandras
• [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Philip Webb
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Philip Webb
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Alec Warner
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Mart Raudsepp
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Philip Webb
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Mart Raudsepp
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Philip Webb
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Walter Dnes
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Ryan Hill
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge »Q«
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Philip Webb
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Piotr Szymaniak
• [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by jokey need a co-maintainer Pacho Ramos
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by jokey need a co-maintainer Sergei Trofimovich
• [gentoo-dev] Some news about status of ConsoleKit and Display Managers in Portage Samuli Suominen
• [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: x11-misc/enter Samuli Suominen
• [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/pisa Krzysztof Pawlik
• [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-java/sun-j2ee Ralph Sennhauser
• [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Ulrich Mueller
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Ulrich Mueller
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Michał Górny
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Mike Frysinger
• [gentoo-dev] econf's localstatedir default doesn't match GNU suggestions W. Trevor King
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] econf's localstatedir default doesn't match GNU suggestions Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] econf's localstatedir default doesn't match GNU suggestions Ulrich Mueller
• [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/xpdf Andreas K. Huettel
• [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/arpack-3.0.2 justin
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/arpack-3.0.2 Rich Freeman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/arpack-3.0.2 justin
• [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: hylafax, tkhylafax Samuli Suominen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: hylafax, tkhylafax Samuli Suominen
• [gentoo-dev] RFC: More versatile return codes for emerge Thomas Kahle
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: More versatile return codes for emerge Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: More versatile return codes for emerge Thomas Kahle
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: More versatile return codes for emerge Alec Warner
• [gentoo-dev] How to handle x86/amd64 only packages on other arches Doug Goldstein
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] How to handle x86/amd64 only packages on other arches Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] How to handle x86/amd64 only packages on other arches Sergei Trofimovich
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] How to handle x86/amd64 only packages on other arches Sergei Trofimovich
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] How to handle x86/amd64 only packages on other arches Xavier Miller
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: How to handle x86/amd64 only packages on other arches Duncan
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] How to handle x86/amd64 only packages on other arches Michał Górny
• [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-php/PEAR-I18N Matti Bickel
• [gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-* Andreas K. Huettel
• [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Diego Elio Pettenò
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Diego Elio Pettenò
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Gilbert
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Gilbert
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Sven Vermeulen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Francesco Riosa
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Zac Medico
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Agostino Sarubbo
  • [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Markos Chandras
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Frysinger
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Fabian Groffen
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Rich Freeman
  • Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld

• Earlier messages