gentoo-dev  

Messages by Date

• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Thomas Sachau
• 2012/02/12 [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-02-12 23h59 UTC Robin H. Johnson
• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml James Broadhead
• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Alexandre Rostovtsev
• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Michał Górny
• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Alexandre Rostovtsev
• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Zac Medico
• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Ulrich Mueller
• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Sergei Trofimovich
• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] media-video/nvidia-settings is orphan for a long time Fabio Erculiani
• 2012/02/12 [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: net-im/skysentials, sys-power/powersoftplus, net-dns/dlint, x11-misc/genmenu Pacho Ramos
• 2012/02/12 [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: x11-terms/wterm, dev-lang/cm3-bin Pacho Ramos
• 2012/02/12 [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-sound/alsa-driver Pacho Ramos
• 2012/02/12 [gentoo-dev] media-video/nvidia-settings is orphan for a long time Pacho Ramos
• 2012/02/12 [gentoo-dev] New global use flag: ayatana Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/12 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Fabian Groffen
• 2012/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Ian Stakenvicius
• 2012/02/11 [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-php/pecl-idn dev-php/pecl-enchant Ole Markus With
• 2012/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Sergei Trofimovich
• 2012/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Sergei Trofimovich
• 2012/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Sergei Trofimovich
• 2012/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/11 [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Sergei Trofimovich
• 2012/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Fabio Erculiani
• 2012/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Michał Górny
• 2012/02/11 [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Fabio Erculiani
• 2012/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Dale
• 2012/02/10 [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Ryan Hill
• 2012/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-shells/ksh Mike Gilbert
• 2012/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Zac Medico
• 2012/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Hilco Wijbenga
• 2012/02/10 [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Ryan Hill
• 2012/02/10 [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-laptop/thinkpad app-laptop/tpctl app-laptop/configure-thinkpad Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/10 [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-shells/ksh Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/10 [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/{libdsk,lib765} Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Hilco Wijbenga
• 2012/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Zac Medico
• 2012/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Matt Turner
• 2012/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? ross smith
• 2012/02/10 [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why? Hilco Wijbenga
• 2012/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement Brian Dolbec
• 2012/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement Michael Haubenwallner
• 2012/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement Bernard Cafarelli
• 2012/02/09 [gentoo-dev] tla.eclass is orphan Pacho Ramos
• 2012/02/09 [gentoo-dev] About masking net-misc/mDNSResponder for removal Pacho Ramos
• 2012/02/09 [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dertobi123 retirement Pacho Ramos
• 2012/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Understanding the LINGUAS variable and use-expand Mart Raudsepp
• 2012/02/08 [gentoo-dev] Understanding the LINGUAS variable and use-expand Mike Gilbert
• 2012/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Alexandre Rostovtsev
• 2012/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net William Hubbs
• 2012/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Ian Stakenvicius
• 2012/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Alec Warner
• 2012/02/07 [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Duncan
• 2012/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net William Hubbs
• 2012/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Ian Stakenvicius
• 2012/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Alexandre Rostovtsev
• 2012/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net William Hubbs
• 2012/02/06 [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Duncan
• 2012/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Alexandre Rostovtsev
• 2012/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net William Hubbs
• 2012/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Alexandre Rostovtsev
• 2012/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Piotr Szymaniak
• 2012/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net Zac Medico
• 2012/02/06 [gentoo-dev] rfc: only the loopback interface should provide net William Hubbs
• 2012/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed: app-office/libreoffice, app-office/libreoffice-bin, app-office/libreoffice-l10n Pacho Ramos
• 2012/02/05 [gentoo-dev] news item: baselayout-1 deprecation William Hubbs
• 2012/02/05 [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-02-05 23h59 UTC Robin H. Johnson
• 2012/02/04 [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass and base.eclass integration Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/04 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr Rich Freeman
• 2012/02/04 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr Alexey Shvetsov
• 2012/02/03 [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-kernel/kerneloops Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/03 [gentoo-dev] Lat rites: app-portage/autounmask Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Dan Douglas
• 2012/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Nirbheek Chauhan
• 2012/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Nirbheek Chauhan
• 2012/02/03 [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed: app-office/libreoffice, app-office/libreoffice-bin, app-office/libreoffice-l10n Andreas K. Huettel
• 2012/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Alec Warner
• 2012/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Samuli Suominen
• 2012/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Gilles Dartiguelongue
• 2012/02/02 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
• 2012/02/02 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/02 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/02 [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
• 2012/02/02 [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/twiki Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/02 [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/twiki Markos Chandras
• 2012/02/02 Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/02 Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/02 Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Michał Górny
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Michał Górny
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Alexandre Rostovtsev
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Michał Górny
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Michał Górny
• 2012/02/01 [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Nirbheek Chauhan
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/01 [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass Mike Frysinger
• 2012/02/01 [gentoo-dev] RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass Nirbheek Chauhan
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? Sebastian Pipping
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? prometheanfire
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? ScytheMan
• 2012/02/01 Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? Alexandre Rostovtsev
• 2012/02/01 [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: FlowScan, CUFlow, and JKFlow Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/31 [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? Sebastian Pipping
• 2012/01/31 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Anthony G. Basile
• 2012/01/31 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/31 [gentoo-dev] Temporary help with my packages Stanislav Ochotnicky
• 2012/01/31 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Philip Webb
• 2012/01/30 [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Ryan Hill
• 2012/01/30 [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge »Q«
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Walter Dnes
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Philip Webb
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Cyprien Nicolas
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Olivier Crête
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Ulrich Mueller
• 2012/01/30 [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge Mart Raudsepp
• 2012/01/30 [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for changed polkit default group Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Philip Webb
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Mart Raudsepp
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Alec Warner
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Philip Webb
• 2012/01/30 Re: [gentoo-dev] doubtful about libjpeg-turbo vs. libjpeg binary compatibility Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
• 2012/01/29 Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
• 2012/01/29 Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around Graham Murray
• 2012/01/29 [gentoo-dev] Re: Keeping older versions around »Q«
• 2012/01/29 Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around Donnie Berkholz
• 2012/01/29 [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-01-29 23h59 UTC Robin H. Johnson
• 2012/01/29 [gentoo-dev] Re: Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass Duncan
• 2012/01/29 Re: [gentoo-dev] app-laptop/thinkpad needs a new maintainer Markos Chandras
• 2012/01/29 Re: [gentoo-dev] Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/29 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/29 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/29 Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/29 Re: [gentoo-dev] app-laptop/thinkpad needs a new maintainer Andreas K. Huettel
• 2012/01/29 Re: [gentoo-dev] app-laptop/thinkpad needs a new maintainer Ian Stakenvicius
• 2012/01/29 [gentoo-dev] Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass Ulrich Mueller
• 2012/01/29 [gentoo-dev] app-laptop/thinkpad needs a new maintainer Pacho Ramos
• 2012/01/29 [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by betelgeuse need a co-maintainer Pacho Ramos
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge Philip Webb
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around Rich Freeman
• 2012/01/28 [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around Ryan Hill
• 2012/01/28 [gentoo-dev] [FYI] php-lib-r1.eclass going to die Matti Bickel
• 2012/01/28 [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: dev-db/pgaccess Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer Pacho Ramos
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages Markos Chandras
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by jokey need a co-maintainer Sergei Trofimovich
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages Pacho Ramos
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages Rich Freeman
• 2012/01/28 [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages Pacho Ramos
• 2012/01/28 [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer Pacho Ramos
• 2012/01/28 [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by jokey need a co-maintainer Pacho Ramos
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Anthony G. Basile
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/28 [gentoo-dev] Some news about status of ConsoleKit and Display Managers in Portage Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Michał Górny
• 2012/01/28 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Ulrich Mueller
• 2012/01/28 [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: x11-misc/enter Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/28 [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/pisa Krzysztof Pawlik
• 2012/01/27 [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-java/sun-j2ee Ralph Sennhauser
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Ulrich Mueller
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] econf's localstatedir default doesn't match GNU suggestions Ulrich Mueller
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Samuli Suominen
• 2012/01/27 [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] econf's localstatedir default doesn't match GNU suggestions Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Anthony G. Basile
• 2012/01/27 [gentoo-dev] econf's localstatedir default doesn't match GNU suggestions W. Trevor King
• 2012/01/27 [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/xpdf Andreas K. Huettel
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] {bi,multi}arch support for all x86/amd64/ppc/sparc systems Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Rich Freeman
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Fabian Groffen
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Mike Frysinger
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Jason A. Donenfeld
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: More versatile return codes for emerge Alec Warner
• 2012/01/27 Re: [gentoo-dev] How help in arch testing work Paweł Hajdan, Jr.

• Earlier messages