On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:40:20PM +0100, George Prowse wrote: > On 10/04/2010 16:25, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 03:06:57PM +0300, Dror Levin wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 07:10, William Hubbs<willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:19:32AM +0200, Ben de Groot wrote: > >>>> On 3 April 2010 20:56, George Prowse<george.pro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> Does mediawiki have captcha ability? > >>>> > >>>> Yes, there are a number of solutions for that. > >>> > >>> ??I realize I am very late on this thread, but please do not go here > >>> ??unless you provide an audio solution as well. ??Otherwise, you will > >>> ??affectively lock blind users out of the wiki, just as they are > >>> ??currentlylocked out of the forums. > >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/284362 > >> We are planning to use ReCaptcha which, as far as I known, provides > >> audio. Please correct me if I'm wrong or if that isn't enough. > > > > Yes, it does. However, I would tend to question how practical their > > audio captcha is. Go to www.captcha.net and try the demo a few times > > and see how much luck you have solving audio captchas from it. > > > Is there a better system? The ideal captcha would not be visual at all. For example, on another site I am involved with, which is not quite online yet, we are talking about implementing tseveral levels of captcha such as:
- a math captcha (you will be asked to solve a simple math problem) - a word captcha (fill in the missing letters of a word) - a phrase captcha (complete the phrase) Could something like one or more of these be possible? -- William Hubbs gentoo accessibility team lead willi...@gentoo.org
pgpdmtX2y3kb6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
