El 21/09/11 18:39, Pandu Poluan escribió: > > > On Sep 21, 2011 9:13 PM, "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" > <klond...@gentoo.org <mailto:klond...@gentoo.org>> wrote: > > > > Well deprecated version removal tends to happen because we are not going > > to aim for those versions stabilization AND there is a newer version > > available AND upstream tends to ignore bugs happening on older versions. > > > > Aha, thanks for the explanation. > > I do agree with the stance to not push for stabilization if older > versions will not be supported by upstream. However, since -r13 is by > definition 5 revisions later than -r8, and to the best of my knowledge > has no show-stopping bugs (at least, none on my systems -- touch > wood!), IMHO -r13 shouldn't be removed. Just remove the intermediate > revisions. > There is a show stopping bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378731 :P > > Especially since going from 2.6.x to 3.x exposed a LOT of package > breakages (e.g., packages hard-coded to expect exactly /^2\.6/), I'm > still not comfortable enough using 3.x. Maybe later in December. > > > What this means for you is that we are not going to force you to upgrade > > but if something fails you are in your own ;) > > > > Fair enough. But now I have to do additional acrobatics for new > systems ;-) > Well you can always use an overlay I think the package wasn't removed. > > > PS: Next time come by #gentoo-hardened we won't bite you, I promise ;) > > > > Proomiiiise...? (in the voice of a little girl) > Well just don't get to near of Aleister :P
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
