On Wed, 07 May 2014 20:57:29 +0200 J. Roeleveld wrote: > On 7 May 2014 20:11:10 CEST, Walter Dnes <waltd...@waltdnes.org> > wrote: > >On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:11:02AM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote > >> On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 05:34:52 PM Walter Dnes wrote: > >> > > >> > Unfortunately, mdev != udev. People running RAID have > >> > problems > >too. > >> > >> I know it isn't. I just find it strange that LVM can't work > >> without udev when I see options which configure the LVM-tools > >> to either double-check udevs actions or even completely bypass > >> udev: > > > > Thanks for the pointer. After turning off the udev-related > > options in > >lvm.conf, I'm getting /dev/mapper device nodes as expected. > > That is good. Now if only mdadm can be confirmed to work with > mdev. I could try it on one of my machines.
And what is the problem with mdadm with mdev? I have such setup:
nothing special here and works fine.
Just to speed up device lookup:
$ grep -v ^# /etc/mdadm.conf
DEVICE /dev/sd*
And here we go:
$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid10]
md0 : active raid10 sdd[3] sdf[2]
2930265088 blocks super 1.2 256K chunks 2 far-copies [2/2] [UU]
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
pgpYAu22dxvLA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
