On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:05:23 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > Which NTPd package would the list recommend using, ntp, openntpd, or > some other package?
chrony - no competition, even for servers. ntpd is way overrated, unnecessarily hard to setup correctly, fragile and contrary to popular belief not even that accurate, unless you use external HW clocks. Chrony is maintained by Red Hat in cooperation with the timekeeping code in the kernel. > openntpd seems to be easier to set up according to wiki.gentoo.org. Many many years ago I helped port openntpd to Linux. It was OK-ish at the time and easier/less hassle than ntpd, but the portable version for Linux stopped working reliably many years ago due to kernel changes. IMHO it really should no longer be in the tree since it gives a false sense of accuracy. just my 0.01€.. -h
