On Thursday, April 28, 2016 04:26:31 AM J. Roeleveld wrote: > On April 28, 2016 12:48:36 AM GMT+02:00, "Max R.D. Parmer" <m...@trystero.is> wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, at 15:17, Stroller wrote: > >> > On Wed, 27 April 2016, at 3:21 pm, Michael Mol <mike...@gmail.com> > > > >wrote: > >> > ... > >> > I have a Freeswitch install on a (non-Gentoo) box at a client. That > > > >client has > > > >> > recently moved to a different PBX product. I will not willingly > > > >install another > > > >> > Freeswitch setup, and my full rant as to why would be a multi-part > > > >blog post. > > > >> I really want to read this. > >> > >> Stroller. > > > >I would also be interested (if it helps to know you'd have an > >audience). > > > >I've been looking at freeswitch and asterisk for an OSTN > >implementation. > >At a glance, freeswitch seemed like it might be the better design (but > >surely experience tells the real story). I'll give kamailio a look now > >too. > > > >-- > >0x7D964D3361142ACF > > Same here. Would love to read this. > > I ended up getting an appliance, rather than building it myself due to time > and cost constraints. > > But for a different location I am thinking of doing it myself. And from the > description, Freeswitch sounds nice.
Bah. So you guys aren't going to let me get away with trash-talking without some accountability of details. OK. I'll let you know when I've written up something; I've already emailed one person a handful of my complaints in bullet form. But that'd need to get more properly fleshed out before I drop it somewhere more archival in nature. -- :wq
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
