On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:00:39 +0200 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote: > >> "b.n." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Daniel Iliev ha scritto: >> > > How about if you remake your site and explain everything there. >> > > What happened (chronologically and in detail) and provide >> > > evidence. Remake it to be clear with simple sentences and easy >> > > for finding the information. Then provide means (as web forum, >> > > mailing list etc) for the visitors to post their comments and >> > > questions. After all that is ready it would absolutely acceptable >> > > to participate in this and every other public list as a normal >> > > member and put links to your site in your signature. >> > > >> > > How about that? >> > >> > I want that too. I back the proposal of Iliev. Joerg, why don't you >> > do that so that you can settle all this in the most informative way >> > possible? >> >> I pointed you to the FAQ and I asked you to tell me what questions >> remain unanswered. > > > Sorry, never saw the message in which you ask what more info to > publish. Perhaps I didn't receive it. > >> >> I am sorry but I can only extend information if people tell me which >> information they like to see. >> > > Actually you can figure out which are the most FAQ from this thread, but > let me help you for the start. Please, publish detailed information > for the following events in chronological order: > > - When the first contact with the attackers took place and what was > the reason for that contact > > - When the first attack took place and what (you suppose if you don't > know for sure) was the reason for the attack. Describe the attack > itself - what were the actions of those who attacked you > > - When other attacks (if any) took place. Describe them. > > - When you changed the license. For what reason. Explain, please, why > there is no problem to mix GPL with CDDL (for me personally it is the > most interesting part) > > - When the fork was launched > > - The exact statement of the lawyers you consulted > > - Any evidence (e-mails, posts to web forums, blogs, > publications, etc) or reference to that evidence that you can > provide > > > That's what I could think off for the moment, but I'm sure others > will fill in the gaps I've left. >
Let me add: do not only *describe*. Post all *sources* that you have. Emails, chats, whatever. Otherwise it's just your word vs someone else, and we cannot decide. Give people the *facts*, and everything will come up by itself. m. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
