* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [06.07.08 12:44]: > Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And the issue is not the licenses itself, but the mixing of the > > licenses in one project. > > Your problem is not to understand the difference between "project" > and "distribution". > Sorry, wrong term. You're right, the problem is about distributions.
"This is a free software license. It has a copyleft with a scope that's similar to the one in the Mozilla Public License, which makes it incompatible with the GNU GPL. This means a module covered by the GPL and a module covered by the CDDL cannot legally be linked together. We urge you not to use the CDDL for this reason." http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses And this is the problem, that e.g. Debian has. This is just a very short explaination to the poster, who has asked for where to find the licenses! *No need to debate* > I recommend _you_ to read the license indormation that comes with cdrtools > and > please do not start a new license debate that leads to nowhere. > I won't read anything related to cdrtools anymore. I won't install it, nor recommend anyone to use it. And this is not about any licensing issue, it is about your way of *communicating*. I still remember the time, when I had to download some license key to get DVDs burned. That was also pretty annoying. > Jörg > You just did yourself *again* what the Germans call "Bärendienst" One pissed of soul Sebastian -- " Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. " Karl Marx [EMAIL PROTECTED]@N GÜNTHER mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpwg5mR3xpUv.pgp
Description: PGP signature