On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:26:46PM +0000, Stroller wrote: > I don't think this is a problem. I would love to know what others > think of the `smartctl` output: > > > r...@sysresccd /root % smartctl -H /dev/sda > smartctl version 5.38 [i486-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce > Allen > Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ > > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === > SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED > Please note the following marginal Attributes: > ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE > UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE > 9 Power_On_Seconds 0x0012 001 001 020 Old_age > Always FAILING_NOW 44803h+12m+16s
You can always run the smart long-test to double check. The FAILING_NOW just indicates that the normalised value falls below the threshold. For Power_On_Seconds, this usually just indicates that your are way pass the warranty. If you really care about your data, swap it out now or make frequent backups. Otherwise I don't see the harm of keeping it until it actually dies. Cheers, W -- Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire et vice versa ~~~ I. Newton