Weird - Actually slower than fuse. Does the 'nolock' nfs mount option
make a difference?
On 3/21/12 1:22 PM, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
[root@lab0-v3 ~]# mount -t nfs -o tcp,nfsvers=3 localhost:/images /mnt
[root@lab0-v3 ~]# cd /mnt
[root@lab0-v3 mnt]# time bash -c 'tar xf /root/linux-3.3.tar ; sync ;
rm -rf linux-3.3'
real 2m26.698s
user 0m0.334s
sys 0m6.943s
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:22 AM, David Coulson<da...@davidcoulson.net> wrote:
On 3/20/12 2:47 AM, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
I'm going to start off and say that I misstated, I must have been
doing my *many-file* tests *inside* VM's running on top of glusterfs.
I post a loopback test later this week.
Can you repeat the test using NFS rather than Fuse? I've seen a approx 2x
performance increase with 'small files' using NFS over Fuse, however I'm not
sure if it's just anecdotal, or actually a reality.
David
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
