On 11/6/13 2:27 PM, Ehsan Sadeghi wrote:
What is this cut-off radius mentioned in the manual? The cut-off radius used
to truncate non-bonded inter-actions may not exceed half the shortest box
vector.


It refers to the longest cutoff used to evaluate nonbonded interactions, whatever that may be for your chosen force field.

http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Minimum_Image_Convention

-Justin

Cheers, Ehsan

----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu> To:
"Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users@gromacs.org> Sent: Wednesday,
November 6, 2013 11:22:09 AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] stopped simulation



On 11/6/13 2:14 PM, Ehsan Sadeghi wrote:
Many thanks Justin. What is an appropriate cut-off value? My box size is
d= 0.5 nm; based on the definition of cut-off radius, its value shouble be
smaller than d/2; therefore 0.24 is an appropriate cut-off value. Am I
right?


No.  The cutoff value is not a function of box size; it is a fixed property
of the force field.  No wonder the simulation is crashing.  If your box is
only 0.5 nm, then a cutoff of 1.5 nm is triple-counting interactions across
PBC!

Refer to the primary literature for the Gromos parameter set you are using
for proper settings.  You haven't said which one you're using, and there may
be slight differences between them.  If the value you're using isn't taken
directly from a paper, it's not credible.

-Justin

Cheers, Ehsan

----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu> To:
"Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users@gromacs.org> Sent:
Wednesday, November 6, 2013 10:54:42 AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] stopped
simulation



On 11/6/13 12:53 PM, Ehsan Sadeghi wrote:
Hi gmx users,

I have simulated ionomer in water solution using gromos force field. But
in middle of simulation(after 2 ns) the simulation stopped and I
received these messages:


WARNING: Listed nonbonded interaction between particles 174 and 188 at
distance 3f which is larger than the table limit 3f nm.

This is likely either a 1,4 interaction, or a listed interaction inside
a smaller molecule you are decoupling during a free energy calculation.
Since interactions at distances beyond the table cannot be computed, they
are skipped until they are inside the table limit again. You will only
see this message once, even if it occurs for several interactions.

IMPORTANT: This should not happen in a stable simulation, so there is
probably something wrong with your system. Only change the
table-extension distance in the mdp file if you are really sure that is
the reason.

Fatal error: 1 particles communicated to PME node 5 are more than 2/3
times the cut-off out of the domain decomposition cell of their charge
group in dimension y. This usually means that your system is not well
equilibrated.


---- I used simulated annealing for equilibrating the system in NVT and
NPT condition. The mdp files are:

---- NVT ------

define     = -DPOSRES integrator = md dt         = 0.002 ; time step (in
ps) nsteps     = 25000 ; Maximum number of steps to perform

; OUTPUT CONTROL OPTIONS nstxout    = 500 nstvout    = 500 nstenergy  =
500 nstlog     = 500 energygrps = Non-Water Water

; NEIGHBORSEARCHING PARAMETERS

nstlist    = 1 ns_type    = grid rlist      = 1.5 pbc        = xyz

; OPTIONS FOR ELECTROSTATICS AND VDW

coulombtype= PME pme_order  = 4 fourierspacing= 0.16 rcoulomb   = 1.5
vdw-type   = Cut-off rvdw       = 1.5

; Temperature coupling

tcoupl     = v-rescale tc-grps    = Non-Water Water tau_t      = 0.1 0.1
ref_t      = 300    300 ; Dispersion correction DispCorr   = EnerPres ;
Pressure coupling is off pcoupl     = no

; Annealing

annealing   = single single annealing-npoints = 5  5 annealing-time = 0
10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 annealing-temp = 300 320 340 360 380 300 320
340 360 380

; GENERATE VELOCITIES FOR STARTUP RUN gen_vel    = yes gen_temp   = 300
gen_seed   = -1

; OPTIONS FOR BONDS constraints = ; all-bonds continuation= no
constraint_algorithm = lincs lincs_iter = 1 lincs_order= 4

--------- NPT ------------

define     = -DPOSRES integrator = md dt         = 0.002 nsteps     =
25000

; OUTPUT CONTROL OPTIONS nstxout    = 500 nstvout    = 500 nstfout    =
500 nstenergy  = 500 nstlog     = 500 energygrps = Non-Water Water

; NEIGHBORSEARCHING PARAMETERS

nstlist    = 5 ns_type    = grid rlist      = 1.5 pbc        = xyz

; OPTIONS FOR ELECTROSTATICS AND VDW

coulombtype= PME pme_order  = 4 fourierspacing= 0.16 rcoulomb   = 1.5
vdw-type   = Cut-off rvdw       = 1.5

; Temperature coupling

tcoupl     = v-rescale tc-grps    = Non-Water Water tau_t      = 0.1 0.1
ref_t      = 300    300 ; Dispersion correction DispCorr   = EnerPres

pcoupl     = Parrinello-Rahman Pcoupltype = Isotropic tau_p      = 2.0
compressibility = 4.5e-5 ref_p      = 1.0 refcoord_scaling = com

; Annealing

annealing   = single single annealing-npoints = 5  5 annealing-time = 0
10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 annealing-temp = 380 360 340 320 300 380 360
340 320 300


; GENERATE VELOCITIES FOR STARTUP RUN gen_vel    = no

; OPTIONS FOR BONDS constraints = ; all-bonds continuation= yes
;continuation from NVT constraint_algorithm = lincs lincs_iter = 1
lincs_order= 4 --------------------------

Is the equilibration time is long enough? I appreciate any
help/suggestion regarding my case.


The cutoffs values (1.5) are wrong for using any of the Gromos parameter
sets. Likely the dynamics have become unstable due to violation of the
physical model.

-Justin



--
==================================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==================================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to