I was under the impression that setting different revision number for different map would be enough. It will extract the files at this revision... (Gerd could you confirm?)
I think that trunkXXX is made for package that are really dependent on the version of OCaml (e.g. dependent on OCaml sources). My take on this is: make it compile for the stable version (now 3.12) and best effort for the other (e.g. since 4.00 is near, I consider it now). Use a revision number to publish the right version of the file for the right suite. 2012/6/16 Markus Mottl <markus.mo...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > the intention was to support different library versions for different > compiler versions. It is tedious to maintain libraries such that they > reliably compile across different OCaml versions. That's why I > usually only make Godi package updates for the latest compiler or if > explicitly requested by users of older build environments. Putting > Godi packages in different "trunks" is the only way I know that works. > > Regards, > Markus > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Sylvain Le Gall <sylv...@le-gall.net> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I don't get the reason why it is in both trunk and trunk400. It can be >> misleading. What is the reason behind this choice ? >> >> Regards >> Sylvain > > > > -- > Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mo...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Godi-list mailing list Godi-list@ocaml-programming.de https://godirepo.camlcity.org/mailman/listinfo/godi-list
