On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 02:10:02PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > My main motiviation is that 'we follow TR29' is much better in terms > of documenting it, testing it and diagnosing bugs in than 'do what vim > does'.
That would work if TR29 specifies clearly the different word boundaries to use for the different features. But it is not the case. Instead, TR29 specifies generic word boundaries that should be tailored for the different features, and the tailoring is left as an exercise for the reader. For the documentation, no need to mention Vim, the Vim word boundaries can be summarized easily. A word is either: - a natural-language word that can include the underscore character; - a contiguous group of non-blank characters. But anyway, this is an implementation detail. -- Sébastien _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list