One post a day is harassing no one, I am simply doing what other dxers do... they offer up monitoring reports/logs on multiple stations at once or post about TP/TA logs... I do the same thing with one signal.
But since no one really seems to be as interested in this Station as me, I won’t send them out anymore. Your voices have been heard lol Not a big deal to me either was, I was enjoying monitoring and logging. This is a hobby, I do it for fun... have I been harsh and needlessly rude at times? Yeah. We get older and learn. I have plenty of other stuff to do besides DXing, such as work... which is why I don’t have the time to post multi station logs every day. Takes too long to type. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 9:35 PM Forrester S <amradio1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think point is to stop harrassing dxers. Youve harrassed me on my dx > catches and i will NEVER forget that. Trust me. > > Todd Skaine > Bloomington mn > > On Sep 27, 2017 8:34 AM, "Zacharias Liangas via Hard-Core-DX" < > hard-core-dx@hard-core-dx.com> wrote: > >> Hmm that reminds me sometimes when i listen to my fav station(s) as RTM >> Sarawak, as dedicated fun of Msian music or some other standard QRM >> outlets that are beyond this post...Luckily 9835 is clear with limited QRM >> from the nearby freqs >> >> Subject: Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker >> To: "Hard-core-dx@hard-core-dx.com" <Hard-core-dx@hard-core-dx.com>, >> "Zach" <sordidandsubl...@gmail.com> >> Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017, 1:11 PM >> >> And and on the subject of contact Stations that interfere with one I >> like... what’s wrong with that? I find something I enjoy, and other >> stations and harming the Reception.... so I make an effort to have it >> rectified when I don’t think said Reception of Oman 15140 should be >> harmed. So what? It didn’t take me >> but an hour or so to contact the >> authorities >> in Cuba and India and right the emails. >> >> DXers may not be a Stations target area but if >> we don’t say something, we >> never know what >> the outcome could be. >> >> We >> should never just accept interference just because we are >> “DX’ers” so I >> am attempting to do >> something about it >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:09 >> AM WHO DARES WINS <broadwin...@msn.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Paul, >> > >> > I find it hilariously >> funny that the same DXer you constantly harass is >> > the same "full time DXer" whom >> you emulate daily with your style of >> > >> reporting logs, your logging language, and now going as far >> as telling us >> > you've been >> contacting offending stations transmitting on the same >> > frequency as your beloved 15140, Oman, >> which your referenced "full time >> > >> DXer" has been doing with success daily for years with >> other stations >> > causing QRM on the same >> time and frequency. Many times this "full time DXer >> > has had much success with stations taking >> his observations seriously, and >> > making >> changes only because he does DX daily as his primary >> occupation. I >> > in the past also had many >> battles with said DXer you mention with continued >> > venom, but found even though his >> corrective style at times rubbed me raw, >> > he was correct in pointing out my wrong >> logs. Perhaps you as I did can >> > learn >> from him and as I did became more careful in my logging >> entries? >> > Your continued proclamation of >> logged headlines of "NEW" DXed stations for >> > you are and have been reported for years >> by many others in the Hobby. I'm >> > >> not saying that it's not interesting your picking up >> another NEW station >> > for you, but for >> even casual SW DXers these stations usually are easy >> > catches. Living in the lower 48 makes >> these stations the norm for most of >> > us >> and doesn't generate much in the form of replies from >> other DX logger's. >> > I know your a >> member of NASWA as I once was and you do receive their >> > weekly SW Flash Sheet which for years has >> had these same "NEW" stations >> > >> listed quite frequently by several part time and full time >> log reporters >> > myself included. The only >> time I ever got responses on my logs were if I >> > picked up truly new non reported or hard >> to catch Shortwave stations. >> > >> > >> > John C. >> > >> > _ >> > Hard-Core-DX mailing list >> > Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com >> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx >> > http://www.hard-core-dx.com/ >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> > THE INFORMATION IN >> THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed >> > and/or modified under the conditions set >> down in the Design Science License >> > >> published by Michael Stutz at >> > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html >> > >> _ >> Hard-Core-DX mailing list >> Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx >> http://www.hard-core-dx.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> >> THE INFORMATION IN THIS >> ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed >> and/or modified under the conditions set down >> in the Design Science License >> published by >> Michael Stutz at >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html >> _ >> Hard-Core-DX mailing list >> Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx >> http://www.hard-core-dx.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> >> THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed >> and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science >> License >> published by Michael Stutz at >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html > > _ Hard-Core-DX mailing list Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx http://www.hard-core-dx.com/ _______________________________________________ THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License published by Michael Stutz at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
