Nothing to do with the content of the language (Standard) Haskell per
se, but if the next revision is going to be the final product of the
Haskell Committee, I'd like to encourage its members to at some stage
write something up about the decade-long design process.

A design rationale would be great, but just as important (and
shorter!) would be a from-the-trenches experience report on language
design by committee, i.e., what worked, what didn't etc.

If nothing else, it could force people to think twice about designing
a new language :-)

--Sigbjorn



Reply via email to