> Nothing to do with the content of the language (Standard) Haskell per > se, but if the next revision is going to be the final product of the > Haskell Committee, I'd like to encourage its members to at some stage > write something up about the decade-long design process. The paper below contains some of the technical rationale for the original design, but does not discuss the political/process issues. -Paul @article{huda89a ,author={Hudak, P.} ,title={Conception, Evolution, and Application of Functional Programming Languages} ,journal={ACM Computing Surveys} ,volume=21 ,number=3 ,year=1989 ,pages={359-411} }
- Re: Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Standard Haskell David Barton
- Re: Standard Haskell Sigbjorn Finne
- Re: Standard Haskell Tony Davie
- Re: Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Standard Haskell David Barton
- Re: Standard Haskell Frank Christoph
- Re: Standard Haskell Frank Christoph
- Re: Standard Haskell Frank Christoph
- Re: Standard Haskell Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: standard Haskell Fergus Henderson
- Re: standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: standard Haskell Ron Wichers Schreur
- Re: standard Haskell Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: standard Haskell Fergus Henderson
- Re: standard Haskell John Hughes
- Re: standard Haskell John Hughes
- Re: standard Haskell Frank Christoph
- Standard Haskell Koen Claessen
- RE: Standard Haskell Frank A. Christoph