Yes.

Peace,

Matt.

From: Joelle Zimmermann 
<joelle.t.zimmerm...@gmail.com<mailto:joelle.t.zimmerm...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 1:03 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] comparison across acquisitions

Thanks Michael and Matt.

Were they all collected at the same site? If not, I'd expect this to make some 
difference.

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
It is a variable in the .csv you download out of the database.  Diffusion isn’t 
affected by this, just fMRI because diffusion was processed with the same recon 
version (old scans were reprocessed).

Peace,

Matt.

From: Joelle Zimmermann 
<joelle.t.zimmerm...@gmail.com<mailto:joelle.t.zimmerm...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 12:58 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] comparison across acquisitions

Thanks for your reply Matt.

By version number, do you mean the "acquisition" - that is, the Q#?

So you expect the fMRI to be more different across acquisitions than the 
diffusion?

Do you recall at which acquisition the image reconstruction version change 
occurred?

Joelle

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
The main thing to consider was a an image reconstruction version change that 
occurred relatively early in the project.  Diffusion data were retroreconned 
(and so all data have the same version), but fMRI raw data had not been saved 
and could not be retroreconned.  We advise using a covariate of no interest for 
version number.

Peace,

Matt.

From: 
<hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>>
 on behalf of Joelle Zimmermann 
<joelle.t.zimmerm...@gmail.com<mailto:joelle.t.zimmerm...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 12:48 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: [HCP-Users] comparison across acquisitions

Hi HCPers,

I'm working with structural and functional connectomes from the S900 HCP. I'm 
wondering how the different acquisitions (ie Q1 Q2 etc) and releases would 
affect comparison across all SCs for example. Was data collected at different 
sites for example? - which may affect comparison across acquisitions.

See below info pasted from behaviour spreadsheet. Do I understand correctly the 
"Release" column is when subjects were first released. but if i am getting all 
data from the S900, then I shouldn't care about this first release?

Thanks,
Joelle

Subject Release Acquisition
100004  S900    Q06
100206  S900    Q11
100307  Q1      Q01
100408  Q3      Q03
100610  S900    Q08
101006  S500    Q06
101107  S500    Q06
101309  S500    Q06
101410  S500    Q06
101612  S900    Q11
101915  Q3      Q04

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to