Hi,

I am getting these values returned, not entirely sure what I am looking at;

mrblonde:~# ethtool -k eth0
Offload parameters for eth0:
rx-checksumming: on
tx-checksumming: on
scatter-gather: on
tcp-segmentation-offload: off
udp-fragmentation-offload: off
generic-segmentation-offload: on
generic-receive-offload: off
large-receive-offload: off
ntuple-filters: off
receive-hashing: off


Does this appear to be good? I've checked the chipset specs and it supports 
checksum offloading.

Saint K.
________________________________________
From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com 
[hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Armitage 
[and...@thirdlife.org]
Sent: 25 July 2011 10:36
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] cpu on i7 920

I wouldn't expect problems with.  But I happily admit to being no expert.

Try ethtool -k <interface> and see what's what?

A

On 25/07/2011 08:42, Saint K. wrote:
> The servers are build on Tyan Tempest i5400 motherboards, based on
> the Intel 5400B chipset platform, the Gbit nic's used on this board
> are Intel 82563EB chips.
>
> I've never really figured the load could be related to the networking
> chip as our throughput tests never really show any issues when tested
> (with all sorts of packet sizes, tcp/udp)
>
> Saint K. ________________________________________ From:
> hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
> [hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Andrew
> Armitage [and...@thirdlife.org] Sent: 25 July 2011 09:36 To:
> hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] cpu on i7
> 920
>
> Maybe the issue is the network hardware? HLDS is very network
> intensive.
>
> I believe that some cards support checksum offloading and some
> don't.
>
> A
>
> On 25/07/2011 07:28, Saint K. wrote:
>> What I am still not getting is that our Xeon E5420's are doing
>> like 70-80% load on a single core for 24 players, and our Xeon
>> E5410's 90%+, where you say your older 4600+ does 70%.
>>
>> Tried all sorts of different kernels out there.
>>
>> Is there perhaps certain BIOS settings which could benefit when
>> running gameservers on them?
>>
>> Ours surely should perform much better then that?
>>
>> Saint K. ________________________________________ From:
>> hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
>> [hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Jesse
>> Molina [je...@opendreams.net] Sent: 25 July 2011 05:15 To:
>> Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list Subject: Re:
>> [hlds_linux] cpu on i7 920
>>
>> I have a AMD Phenom x6 1055T doing multiple servers at the same
>> time. TF2 causes the active core to go to 100% for about two
>> seconds during map changes, but otherwise I've never seen it go
>> that high for extended periods of time.  Average during full
>> 24-player usage is about 40%.
>>
>> I also have an older AMD Athlon64 x2 4600+ that runs a single
>> 24-player TF2 quickplay server.  It averages 70% usage when full
>> and gameplay is great.
>>
>> Both of these are desktop class boards with DDR2 PC800M RAM.
>> Linux 2.6.39.
>>
>> Try watching your CPU usage at (relatively) high resolution with
>> something like "htop -d 1"
>>
>> No clue why you are maxing out like that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Eric Riemers wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I run a 32 slots server on a i7 920 @ 2.67ghz, but i can see
>>> with top and such that its potentially maxing out at 100% at
>>> times since it only uses one core. Is it really now doing so much
>>> cpu that even a i7 core isn't enough? Didn't have much complaints
>>> before the pew pew.
>>>
>>> 24 slots on the same server do around 60% when full.
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe,
>>> edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
>>> visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>
>> -- # Jesse Molina # Mail = je...@opendreams.net # Page =
>> page-je...@opendreams.net # Cell = 1.602.323.7608 # Web  =
>> http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe,
>> edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
>> visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>
>> _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe,
>> edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
>> visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>
> _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit
> your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
> _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit
> your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to