Greetings Neal,

I'm not sure that I understand this.  If a page 'X' is linked only by 
a page 'Y' which isn't changed since the previous dig, do we parse 
the unchanged page 'Y'?  If so, why not run  htdig -i?  If not, how 
do we know that page 'X' should still be in the database?

I'd be inclined not to fix this until after we've released the next 
"archive point", whether that be 3.2.0b5 or 3.2.0rc1...

Cheers,
Lachlan

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:56, Neal Richter wrote:
> The workaround is to use 'htdig -i'.  This is a disadvantage as we
> will revisit and index pages even if they haven't changes since the
> last run of htdig.
>
> Here's the Fix:
>
> 1) At the start of Htdig, after we've opened the DBs we 'walk' the
> docDB and mark EVERY document as Reference_obsolete.  I wrote code
> to do this.. very short.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht://Dig developer DownUnder  (http://www.htdig.org)


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev

Reply via email to