In
<009066fa266f9b428db827deaa3c0e2701a6e...@exchangevs-04.ad.wsu.edu>,
on 06/14/2010
   at 12:13 PM, "Gibney, Dave" <gib...@wsu.edu> said:

>  I prefer to have the ISV datasets in LINKLST statements in PROGxx
>cataloged in the master catalog and not use volume references.

And others prefer to keep them out of the MC.

>Am I just being anal (I really don't like volume references in parm
>members anywhere I can avoid them), or is the a legitimate concern
>that would support either position?

There are legitimate reasons for keeping as much as possible out of
the MC. Have you considered using static system symbols for the
volsers?
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to