-------------------------------<snip>---------------------------------
I respectfully submit that the use of SVC 32 is archaic and
cumbersome and should be discouraged in favor of DYNALLOC (SVC 99)
whenever possible.
I said that it was possible; I didn't recommend it.
-------------------------------<unsnip>--------------------------------
Noted.
------------------------------------<snip>----------------------------
How many of our list participants are sufficiently skillful to
construct a partial DSCB correctly?
Probably a dozen. ObRobertZimmerman Of those, how many would actually
do it in a production environment.
---------------------------------<unsnip>----------------------------
Given the ease of use of DYNALLOC, I seriously doubt that anyone would
even attempt it anymore. Except perhaps as an exercise in masochism. :-)
Rick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
