In <snt113-w1bb5fda98f56435233d23c6...@phx.gbl>, on 08/23/2011
at 04:12 PM, john gilmore <john_w_gilm...@msn.com> said:
>An apparently not quite obvious corollary of this distinction is that
>LINK[X] makes a LOAD[X] available under the hood/bonnet; SYNCH[X]
>does not.
Not quite. LINK creates a PRB and does not create an LLE. LOAD creates
or updates an LLE and does not create a PRB.
>(A copy known to be present will, of course, be used if it is
>refreshable or reentrant.)
If it's linked with REFR without RENT then it is not treated as being
reentrant. Also, a copy with a 0 use count will be used if it was
linked with REUS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
