I think that you answered your own question. "aside from not recovering the victim(s) of a ++DELETE command?"
I could never understand why that is the case. RESTORE should restore everything. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Error apply ZAP > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > > [ snip ] > It's a major design shortcoming that one can't REDO a ZAP. It would be so easy -- if PARM=REDO and > the content of the module matches the REP, assume it's OK. And SMP/E should supply the REDO parm to > AMASPZAP for APPLY REDO. > > (There should also be a PARM=UNDO.) How does RESTORE not accomplish an UNDO, aside from not recovering the victim(s) of a ++DELETE command? -jc- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately. Thank you. Aetna ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
