We do currently have Jobtrac v11 SP3 running in production, but it
hasn't been the most stable or reliable version by any means.  The
addition of Datacom was a challenge on the install, and has added more
overhead and pain as well.  Reporting used to be a lot easier to deal
with, and response time for some commands is now outrageous thanks to
Datacom.

Also, we had one instance where a job abended but Jobtrac marked it as
complete, so I opened a ticket with CA.  Their answer was pretty much
that they didn't know what happened, and since I was never able to
recreate the problem, they said it's working like it's supposed to.
Essentially, they blew off the whole issue.  If it were possible to go
back and run 3.5 unsupported, I'd be very, very tempted.  It was
rock-solid and never gave us anything near the grief we've had so far
with R11...

Bret Hoesly

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Carlson, Steven
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 5:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

I have been working on getting CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 to be implemented into
our production environment. Has anyone else been able to use CA-JOBTRAC
V11 SP3 in their production environment?

Steve Carlson
z/OS Systems Services
National Semiconductor
Corporation
2900 Semiconductor Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95051
Tel:(408)721-8071
Email:asx...@nsc.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to