On Tuesday 30 Sep 2008, M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD wrote: > Could you dare to challenge if redhat puts its logo and art work at > your property and products and claim trademark ownership rights ? in > the similar way would you object redhat which has put its logo and > art work in RHEL Linux distribution and claimed the trade mark > product ownership in RHEL when redhat is not the owner of RHEL. and > GPL is the owner ..Could you dare to challenge the redhat.Redhat inc > is under attack from open source community . > > I know Linux and GPL is bigger than redhat. But it's unfortunate > that redhat is blatantly violating GPL by not permitting any body or > every body to redistribute the RHEL !
I'd suggest you figure out the differences between trademarks and licences before claiming that what someone is doing is illegal. Please also examine RH's claims about ownership (whether they claim to own the distribution or the trademarks) carefully. As far as I know no one in his/her right mind who understands these issues claims that RH is in violation or either law or ethics in their distribution. I'm quite willing to participate in a sane, /informed/ discussion on these issues in the list; OTOH if all you want to do is troll please include me out. Regards, -- Raju -- Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
