Hello Dmitry, this is a good idea imo. It sounds like the most natural solution - to me.
marcus Thursday, September 20, 2007, 12:04:04 PM, you wrote: > From technical point of view it is possible to propagate LSB with self::, > parent::, and static:: and not with CLASS::. > I think it may be a good compromise. > Thanks. Dmitry. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stefan Walk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 1:10 PM >> To: Dmitry Stogov; internals@lists.php.net >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [patch] Late static bindings (LSB) >> >> >> Is it possible or feasible to distinguish betwenn parent:: >> and NameOfParentClass::? That would allow to push a call "up" >> while preserving the called name while not making Class:: >> mean different things depending on the location of the call, >> which is a very bad thing IMO (it's an effect that may not be >> desired). >> >> Regards, >> Stefan >> Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
