Jochen Schmitt wrote: > If you wrote 'This software is not designed for using for ...' > this may be ok. But if you wrote 'Thsi software is not licensed > for use ...' that is a usage restriction which we can't accept. > > I agree with you, that an open source author may not take the > warrenty for using the software in a special situation, but if > you wrote 'is not licensed for' that sound like to prohibit the > usage of the software for a special case.
The conversation was interesting, but now I'm confused: is there any further action required by us? I mean: the sun.txt has been removed from SVN. It's no longer in iText 1.5.3. I see it's still in iText 2.0.4, but it won't be in iText 2.0.5 (the next release is scheduled for September). br, Bruno ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://itext.ugent.be/itext-in-action/
