Hello,

> >This naming service would eventually need to be some sort of
> >federated/replicated thing, for HA. Each instance in the cluster
> might run
> >its own NS.
>
> that would be my recommendation too, just like weblogic where
> each node runs
> its own NS and content gets replicated across the cluster using multicast.
>
> using a shared NS becomes to much of a headache.

I aggree with you and sorry if my suggestion wasn't clear enough. We have
many NS (one per server for example) each synchronized to (i.e. a replicate
of) the other through group communication (hence the
sourceforge.net/projects/javagroups link). This provide better HA,
scalability, and performance (as resolution can be made locally).

Cheers,



                        Sacha


Reply via email to