Yes! There was a slight difference in the binding I was using with the <include>. Using the exact same binding in both places, the shared library now compiles correctly. Also using the updated snapshot jars did point me to exactly where the difference was.
Thanks, Josh Landry DSosnoski wrote: > > That's a strange one. Are you sure the binding used with the jar code is > the same one you're using with the <include>? It looks like there's an > abstract mapping in the <include> which was not in the binding used for > the code in the jar. > > I've added a check for this condition in the current code which should > supply the details of what's different. Can you download the latest > build jars from the Maven(1) repository, at > http://jibx.sourceforge.net/maven/jibx/jars/ and give that a try (look > for the 1.2.2-SNAPSHOT jars)? > > Thanks, > > - Dennis > > Dennis M. Sosnoski > XML and Web Services in Java > Training and Consulting > http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz > Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Error-trying-to-use-precompiled-bindings-and-extended-classes-tp25355028p25645399.html Sent from the jibx-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
