The factory-method option could never apply to anything that doesn't
have an associated object, but the others could. I think it'd be more
confusing to have these separate. To me it makes sense that all these
methods should apply at the level of a Java object. I'll think about it,
though. You can add this as an enhancement request in Jira if you want,
so I don't forget about it.
- Dennis
Beet wrote:
okay, I see what you're saying...
the problem with going up a level is that you lose the level of
granularity you sometimes need. I know that you listed some
workarounds before, and that's what I'm using right now, but it seems
like it'd be a nice little 'enhancement' to allow method hooks at this
level.
Or is it just not possible? I admit I haven't seen the source code,
so maybe I'm just not getting something.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:45:43 -0800, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, that makes it clear. The post-set method (along with factory,
pre-set, and pre-get) only get used when there's an object associated
with the <structure>. In this case you don't have an actual object, just
some contained fields. If you go up a level (or more) to where you have
the definition of your actual object (generally either as a <mapping>
element or a contained <structure> that references a field of the
containing object) you can use the post-set method there.
It should really be an error to specify post-set on a <structure> that
doesn't define an object. I'll add a check for this in the beta 4 code,
which has much better error checking and handling in general.
- Dennis
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
