Hi Archie, For a single binding file it works fine, JIBX_*.access class file is generated in the package mentioned in the bindings.xml file.
However when I introduced a second bindings file with a separate package mentioned in both bindings.xml files. The access classes for both bindings are generated in the package mentioned in the first bindings.xml. Thanks and Regards, Dickson Rodrigues On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 3:46 PM Archie Cobbs <archie.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dickson, > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 1:51 PM Dickson Rodrigues < > rodrigues.dick...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Will you please take a look at the attached project and see why we >> get the access files generated in the billing package? I am using ant >> 1.9.14 and running it on mac. >> > > Hang on - the original problem was that JiBX was generating files in the > default package instead of the same package as the model classes. > > My suggestion was that by adding a missing "package" attribute to the > <binding> element, that would fix the problem, which - in my test at least > - it did. > > I never suggested that the converse was true, i.e., that by removing the > "package" attribute from the <binding> element that you would somehow cause > JiBX to not generate ANY files in the model package. > > In my experience JiBX almost always generates classes in the model > package, for reasons having to do with Java package-private accessibility. > > -Archie > > -- > Archie L. Cobbs >
_______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
