On 2005-02-28 (11:01) Bob Hanson wrote: > > >timothy driscoll wrote: > >> >> >>so I would argue against putting a visible, active Jmol on your >>home >page, for example >>, until you can run some basic compatibility checks. > >I worry about this on the new Jmol test page. Is that page set up to >detect the absense of capability to run the applet? Or does it just >look bad when the capability isn't there? > the capability exists in Jmol.js to test all aspects of the user system (browser, system, various functionality). I don't know whether these tests are enabled by default at the Jmol home pages.
tim -- Timothy Driscoll molvisions - see, grasp, learn. <http://www.molvisions.com/> usa:north carolina:wake forest "A debugged program is one for which you have not yet found the conditions that make it fail." - Jerry Ogdin ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
