> Of course the most famous attribute memory-saving scheme is Michael's 
> permgen attribute string scheme for dbf files.  That one saves a ton 
> of memory on typically redundant data, until you run out of permgen 
> memory.
Note that I changed the mechanism which now use normal memory through a 
simple hashmap in DbfFile instead of using permgen which was causing 
troubles with non-redundant data.

Michaël
>
> Larry
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Martin Davis <mbda...@refractions.net 
> <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net>> wrote:
>
>     re Mutating Geometry in-place - JTS discourages this, but does not
>     prevent it.  Sometimes people do this when they are transforming
>     coordinates (eg. translation or affine transform)..    It's quite
>     possible that all the JUMP code is clean, however.  In any case, this
>     will only be an issue if that particular function is used.
>
>     re tracking modifications - how about providing a method that lets you
>     clear the modified flag?  Then the feature can be constructed as
>     necessary and then marked as clean.
>
>     It seems heavyweight to carry around a set of data which is only
>     really
>     of use during the construction phase of a Feature.  To avoid this, I'd
>     even suggest constructing a Feature as needed, then creating a new
>     Feature from it via a constructor which sets the modified flag
>     appropriately.  Anything to avoid requiring more storage.
>
>     How does GeoTools handle this?
>
>     Larry Becker wrote:
>     > The tricky thing about modifications is not to find a record is
>     > modified just because you set the initial value.  It is only
>     modified
>     > if you set it more than once, otherwise all records would be set as
>     > modified as soon as they are loaded.
>     >
>     > The next trick is to consider that you call setAttribute multiple
>     > times with different attribute indexes, so it is necessary to track
>     > the changes to each one separately.
>     >
>     > Mutating Geometries in place is a concern.  I have never seen code
>     > that does this, and certainly none of the edit tools or any plugins
>     > that use transactions do this, but it may be possible.  Could
>     you just
>     > modify the Coordinate.x and y values?  I'll try to construct a
>     > Beanshell test for this, but I doubt that this is a serious concern.
>     > All of the tools and plugins that I have tried so far play by
>     the rules.
>     >
>     > Larry
>     >
>     > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Martin Davis
>     <mbda...@refractions.net <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net>
>     > <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net
>     <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Larry, why do you use an int rather than a boolean to flag
>     changed
>     >     attributes?
>     >
>     >     BTW, In order to track changes to Geometry attributes
>     correctly, the
>     >     JUMP codebase needs to be scrutinized to make sure it isn't
>     mutating
>     >     Geometries "in place".
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     Larry Becker wrote:
>     >     > Hi,
>     >     >
>     >     >   As I mentioned in the other thread, before the problem
>     of partial
>     >     > database updates can be solved, we must first be able to
>     >     determine if
>     >     > a Feature has been modified.  This is not currently
>     possible in
>     >     all of
>     >     > the JUMP variants that I am familiar with, although Kosmo
>     may have
>     >     > implemented it.
>     >     >
>     >     > The simplest way of implementing it that I can see is to
>     modify
>     >     > BasicFeature to include:
>     >     >
>     >     > private int[] attributeModCount;  //this is a parallel
>     array to
>     >     > Object[] attributes
>     >     >
>     >     > Then it would be necessary to allocate the
>     attributeModCount array
>     >     > when setAttributes(Object[] attributes) is called.
>     >     >
>     >     > In addition each time setAttribute(int attributeIndex, Object
>     >     > newAttribute) is called, add the line of code:
>     >     >
>     >     > attributeModCount[attributeIndex]++
>     >     >
>     >     > With these modifications we could then define:
>     >     >
>     >     > public boolean isFeatureModified() {
>     >     >     for (int i=0; i<attributeModCount.length; i++) {
>     >     >       if (attributeModCount[i] > 1)  //modified is defined as
>     >     setting
>     >     > an attribute more than once
>     >     >          return true;
>     >     >     }
>     >     > return false;
>     >     > }
>     >     >
>     >     > Would this work and does this seem like something we should
>     >     consider?
>     >     >
>     >     > regards,
>     >     > Larry
>     >     > --
>     >     > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
>     >     >
>     >    
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >    
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >    
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >     >
>     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>     >     > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     >     <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>     >     > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     --
>     >     Martin Davis
>     >     Senior Technical Architect
>     >     Refractions Research, Inc.
>     >     (250) 383-3022
>     >
>     >
>     >    
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >     Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
>     >     Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables
>     unlimited
>     >     royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for
>     externally
>     >     facing
>     >     server and web deployment.
>     >     http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>     >     Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     >     <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>     >     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     >
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
>     > Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
>     > royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for
>     externally facing
>     > server and web deployment.
>     > http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>     > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>     >
>
>     --
>     Martin Davis
>     Senior Technical Architect
>     Refractions Research, Inc.
>     (250) 383-3022
>
>
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
>     Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
>     royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally
>     facing
>     server and web deployment.
>     http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
>     _______________________________________________
>     Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>     Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
> royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
> server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to