> For CML1 and CML2 to handle the same language, we would either have > to live with the CML1 language's limitations or retrofit the old tools > to speak CML2 language. The chance of the latter happening is, I think > we can agree, effectively zero. Being able to turn CML2 into CML1 might be the more useful exercise. Alan _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philoso... Eric S. Raymond
- [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads... Jes Sorensen
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Wayne . Brown
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Keith Owens
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philoso... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Greg Banks
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Jes Sorensen