Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

[Alan Cox]

> On 05/18/2001 at 02:44:07 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >But the real question is whether the old tools have enough value to be
> >worth the effort.  What problem are you trying to solve here?
> 
> How about:
> 1.  Some of us are perfectly satisfied with the existing tools and don't want
>       them to be yanked out from under us.

> 2.  Some of us have no interest in Python and don't like being forced to deal
>       with installing/upgrading it just for CML2.

Since someone is rewriting CML2 in C that #2 is a non issue. #1 may be a case
of bolting alternative ui's onto the parser 


_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel