> But the real question is whether the old tools have enough value to be > worth the effort. What problem are you trying to solve here? Im just playing with ideas and writing a CML1 parser for amusement while I ponder single pass computation of the entire dependancy graph from a CML1 rule base 8) _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philoso... Eric S. Raymond
- [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads... Jes Sorensen
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Wayne . Brown
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Keith Owens
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philoso... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Greg Banks
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Jes Sorensen
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philoso... Nicolas Pitre
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... M.