On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 10:54:00PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Jason Wessel wrote:
>
> > This patch is committed in the linux2_6_21_uprev branch across:
> > core-lite.patch core.patch i386-lite.patch x86_64-lite.patch
>
> BTW, what's the reason we *still* have both
> {core|i386|ia64|powerpc|x86_64}-lite.patch and
> core{core|i386|ia64|powerpc|x86_64}.patch? Why not just merge them?
There are features that are complete and clean enough that submitting
them upstream shouldn't be a problem, and other things which either
aren't 100% and/or require a lot of though and cooperation with other
groups (hardware break/watch points for example) or things that simply
seem unlikey to get in (compiling with -O0 or -O1, I forget which) or
more contentious and non-critical.
--
Tom Rini
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
