Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > Furthermore, even if they *can* admin that computer, they are not > *going* to. No teacher in their right mind is going to do something > that means they have to accept the responsibility for what happens on > that computer. You can thank the "OHMYGAWD! My child saw <gasp> > *PORN*. And he/she would *never* search for that. It's the > *teacher's* > fault.". It will be the teacher's fault despite the fact that their > children have drunken, naked pictures on their > MySpace/Facebook/NarcissisticWeb2.0SiteOfTheMoment pages.
And if you think Andy is wrong, just look up this case. Teacher Convicted in Porn Case Substitute Teacher's Porn Conviction Sparks Tech Debate WINDHAM, Conn. Feb 13, 2007 (AP) Until recently, Julie Amero says, she lived the quiet life of a small-town substitute teacher, with little knowledge of computers and even less about porn. Now she is in the middle of a criminal case that hinges on the intricacies of both, and it could put her behind bars for up to 40 years. She was convicted last month of exposing seventh-grade students to pornography on her classroom computer. She contended the images were inadvertently thrust onto the screen by pornographers' unseen spyware and adware programs. http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2872230 -- Neil Schneider pacneil_at_linuxgeek_dot_net http://www.paccomp.com Key fingerprint = 67F0 E493 FCC0 0A8C 769B 8209 32D7 1DB1 8460 C47D A banker is a fellow who lends you his umbrella when the sun is shining, but wants it back the minute it begins to rain. - Mark Twain -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
