begin quoting Neil Schneider as of Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:30:08PM -0800: > > Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > > > Furthermore, even if they *can* admin that computer, they are not > > *going* to. No teacher in their right mind is going to do something > > that means they have to accept the responsibility for what happens on > > that computer. You can thank the "OHMYGAWD! My child saw <gasp> > > *PORN*. And he/she would *never* search for that. It's the > > *teacher's* fault.". It will be the teacher's fault despite the > > fact that their children have drunken, naked pictures on their > > MySpace/Facebook/NarcissisticWeb2.0SiteOfTheMoment pages. > > And if you think Andy is wrong, just look up this case. There are pictures of naked drunk seventh graders on the Intarwebz?
> Teacher Convicted in Porn Case > Substitute Teacher's Porn Conviction Sparks Tech Debate > > WINDHAM, Conn. Feb 13, 2007 (AP)? Until recently, Julie Amero says, > she lived the quiet life of a small-town substitute teacher, with > little knowledge of computers and even less about porn. > > Now she is in the middle of a criminal case that hinges on the > intricacies of both, and it could put her behind bars for up to 40 > years. EVEN if it was deliberate, premeditated, and maliciously done, 40 years is /far/ too long. Vindictive and cruel punishment, that is. > She was convicted last month of exposing seventh-grade students to > pornography on her classroom computer. She contended the images were > inadvertently thrust onto the screen by pornographers' unseen spyware > and adware programs. > > http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2872230 Kids + computers + Internet = Bad Idea. Might as well have a field trip to a strip club. -- I blame the parents. No, wait, I blame Javascript. Stewart Stremler -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
