So, is there any other option appart from DebugLn(), that works? Regards! -Marco
2007/12/1, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Marco Alvarado wrote: > > It's a Win32 API function: > > > > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363362.aspx > > > > Outputs a string to the debugger. Lazarus is able to catch those > > messages, although the output in Lazarus is pretty dirty, and is > > somehow difficult to read. > > Correction, lazarus does not catch that output. It's gdb which does. > Lazarus doesn't intrepret these mesages, so you will find them among > other debugger output. I don't call this support, it just happens to be > there. > > > I supposed DebugLn would work the same way, > > Nope, it is a replacement for writeln, for cases where there is no stdout. > > > but no :( Hope someday DebugLn will be connected to the debbuger. > > It won't. > > And since I cannot destinct gdb output from console output, there is no > way to show the output on the console (like debugln output). > > > Marc > > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > "unsubscribe" as the Subject > archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives > _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
