On Sunday 09 February 2003 02:12 pm, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 11:55, Ray Olszewski wrote: > > Really, it need not be all or nothing here; "fairness" does not enter > > into it. A branch-specific list is a benefit to the developer only if he > > sees it that way; for some, it could be a nuisance. For example, some > > months ago, questions about a new, small-linux distro started turning up > > on the linux-newbie list. We regulars there were puzzled at first, until > > we found out that the distro's creator listed linux-newbie as the place > > for his users to post their questions. It actually worked pretty well, > > once we know what was going on. Clearly, *he* didn't want a > > distro-specific list, and some of our lead developers may feel the same > > way. But some might want one, so why not accommodate both preferences? > > Everyone, > Is this solution acceptable? If so, I'll create release/branch specific > lists upon LEAF release/branch lead developer request.
This would be acceptable with me. -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Firewall Project developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
