09.04.2015 17:47, Erich Titl пишет: > Am 09.04.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Andrew: > ... >> So let's store both packed modules + unpacked on server side, as we >> decided earlier. >> Packed modules will be suitable for routers with enough storage space; >> unpacked - for tiny systems. >> I just voting against excluding packed modules in prefer to unpacked >> tree. It'll break usability in many cases. > That is fine with me, let's just unpack in a first step as I did in > branch 5.1.4-rc2 we can decide to move to squashfs later. > > .. > >>> I am building moddb of course, and for the people requiring extra >>> modules they will be able to include them easily. >> I mean moddb save/load logic. It'll be unneeded in most cases and empty, >> but it'll leave possibility to load custom modules. > We will always need this functionality, I will not touch it. > ... > >>> They are, but of course they cannot be replaced automatically if they >>> are not in either the tarball, the squashfs or in the modules directory. >> They'll be in modules directory because they'll be in moddb. > Yes, but they will not be recent, so they might break the system. In worst case they will not be loaded. And they will require manual update - like before. And we have no possibility to automate this - by using tarball with modules, or by using squashfs. User in both cases should copy custom modules to moddb or to lib/modules. >> As I said, I expect that squash will be mounted on boot on >> /lib/modules/<kernel version>, then - modules probing will be ran, then >> - modules will be copied to /etc/modules, exclusions for them will be >> added to moddb (to not store these modules in moddb), and then - unmount >> squash and re-probe modules from /etc/modules (for loading custom modules). > I have not touched the boot process on purpose. If you decide to change > it, be my guest. I'll look on it when I'll have enough time. > > ... > >> For me, squashfs will be also better than tarball. It'll remove need of >> module autoprobing, and it'll make system upgrade easier than with >> tarball (esp. for system with NICs that aren't in moddb). > I understand > > cheers > > ET > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > > > _______________________________________________ > leaf-devel mailing list > leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
