Yes, I agree. I think there are some enhancement requests for marriage tagging in Mantis (bug/enhancement tracking). I hope that in the near future the marriage tags will get the same options as the individual tags. Evert
2009/9/7 Ron Taylor <doit4...@yahoo.com> > Under search you can find all marriages that have status "divorced" but > at this point the option to tag all of those marriage records has not been > added to the program. You can manually set those tags in Legacy and then > use the Marriage Tag tool at the bottom right to look at each of the tagged > marriages. Another good example would be to find all marriages with place > containing "Boise". The search works well but again there is no option to > set those marriage tags for the search results. Instead, you can set the > individual tag but if an individual has multiple marriages...not all of them > will be in Boise so you will have to page through them to find the one that > triggered the tag. > > Summary: Marriage tagging could be a valuable tool and should be > developed. Millennia needs to add to the "Advanced Tagging" the option to > tag the marriages. Most of the other tools are already present to use those > tags in searches, etc. > > Ron Taylor > > --- On *Mon, 9/7/09, Evert van Dijken <evandij...@gmail.com>* wrote: > > > From: Evert van Dijken <evandij...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] The marriage tag - What is is good for? > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Date: Monday, September 7, 2009, 5:55 AM > > Yes, I belong to those most people, and never had any reason to use the > Marriage Tag. I only meant that a user who tagged the marriages can print > the Search List of those tagged marriages. > How usefull this is? I don't know. > Evert > > 2009/9/7 Jenny M Benson > <ge...@cedarbank.me.uk<http://mc/compose?to=ge...@cedarbank.me.uk> > > > >> Jenny M Benson wrote >> >>> Like most people, I find the full range of Individual Tags indispensable, >>> use the Source Tag sometimes and the Location Tag occasionally, but have >>> never had any reason to use a Marriage Tag. >>> >> >> Perhaps I'd better clarify that. I meant the "like most people" to apply >> to the first part only, about Individual Tags. >> >> -- >> Jenny M Benson >> >> >> >> Legacy User Group guidelines: >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp> >> Archived messages: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ >> Online technical support: >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp> >> To unsubscribe: >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp> >> >> >> >> > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp> > Archived messages: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp> > To unsubscribe: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp> >
