Daphne, You must have missed my reply to Boyd on the 13th on the tree subject. I export my whole database which has 14 trees however, since I am the only one that is an admin and I assign new users “Tentative updates to Names, Places and Sources” I only have one Tree on my TNG site. Incase you missed it or deleted it here was my reply:
I have 14 trees in my Family file of 25,617 individuals, however, since I am the only admin on my TNG site there is only one “Tree” on the site that includes all the individuals in my 14 Trees. Tree 1 has 20397 individuals at RIN 1, me. Tree 2 has 40 at RIN 13655, Broad, Eliza Jane. Tree 3 has 21 at RIN 162, Wallace, William, Sir. Tree 4 has 14 at RIN 13099, Howard, John M.. Tree 5 has 12 at RIN 13838, Snider, William. Tree 6 has 3 at RIN 164, Halladay, John, Sir. Tree 7 has 3 at RIN 166, Halladay, Thomas. Tree 8 has 3 at RIN 15191, Evans, Lyman. Tree 9 has 2 at RIN 15051, Kutz, Mary Polly. Tree 10 has 2 at RIN 17917, Pratt. Tree 11 has 1 at RIN 7712 Halladay, Francis. Tree 12 has 1 at RIN 12638, Coppers, Richard “Dick”. Tree 13 has 1 at RIN 16149, Pratt, Jonathan. Tree 14 has 1 at RIN 20350, Snyder, David. The reason for including all of these trees in the one TNG Tree is that a visitor may come along and have a connection to one of the trees that may lead to a connection to the main tree. You may notice that there are high number RINs that have only 1 or a few individuals, they are in my file as unconnected or unproven connections to my main line. They may be witnesses on a document usually two or more documents that I have not found a link to, or as Trees 2, 5, 12 and 14 are users on my site who may have or have not submitted a lineage to me for inclusion or connection. A few like the Halladay and Wallace Trees are there for historical or legends links. The Halladay surname is my largest and legend has them descendants of Sir William Wallace, of Scotland, thus Tree 3. There is a privacy policy on my site for new users that tells the criteria for becoming a registered user and that they should be at least connected to one of the surnames listed on the site and show their connections. Since my site has been around for awhile (when it was first on AOL>rootsweb which was data mined and had lots of errors and someone claimed it was their tree a whole another story>to my own website powered by TNG) I have reduced the number of separate trees and have merged a couple and deleted a whole line of unproven Halladay’s from a bogus tree created in the 19th and early 20th century! Thus the RED Font DISCLAIMER on my site that not all sources have been checked! Does that help? From: D. Eze Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 4:02 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] creating a Gedcom Thank you so much everyone for your imput. I figured out some of the problem. I think there was something wrong with my "Main" legacy file. When I exported the whole file as either "gedcom for legacy" or "new legacy file" Jessie and Alexander were unlinked. So in the new legacy file I relinked them and then exported as "gedcom" and everything was fine. R G Stong-genes I really appreciate your explanation of how you export for TNG. I have one more question. Did you split you Legacy file into different files or did you make focus groups to export so that you could import the separate trees into TNG? Daphne Eze On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Wendy Howard <wendy.how...@gmail.com> wrote: If I'm reading you right, you need to link Alexander and Jessie as husband and wife. Right-click on one of them and select Add... from the menu that pops up, then select the appropriate spouse (husband or wife, depending on who you started with), and then add an existing person and navigate to the other spouse. Since this is Jessie's first marriage, but you're entering it after her second one, click on Jessie's spouse icon and sort the marriages into their proper order, so they appear in that order in reports. Hope this helps. :-) Wendy D. Eze wrote on 13/01/2016 12:52: > When I create a gedcom from Legacy 8.0.0.536 it leaves out a whole > branch. I have untagged everyone. > > When I was creating the gedcom I did Ctrl-E then next to "produce file > for" I choose "gedcom 5.5.1 only", and then next "record selection" I > left it at "all records in the entire family file". Next I clicked the > export button. > > I want to import this into TNG. I checked the gedcom in the program > "Ahnenblatt" to make sure it wasn't a problem with TNG. The > information in missing in the gedcom. > > After investigating some more I realized that the people are there but > they are not connected thro their marriage like they should be. > > Alexander shows up with his first wife (Louisa) but not his second > (Jessie). Jessie shows up with her second husband (William) but not > her first (Alexander). > > So the link I need is between Alexander and his second wife Jessie. > > Does anyone know what is wrong?* > > > * > Daphne Eze Legacy User Group guidelines: Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
