Frederik Ramm <frede...@...> writes: > I think you have understood this all right. In my eyes there's a wide > band between clearly non-copyrightable edits on one side (which we could > legally keep in OSM even if the person who added them said no - but > we're unlikely to exercise that right) and edits that are clearly > "works" on the other (which are thus copyrightable in some countries). > In between there may well lie some edits that are extremely unlikely to > qualify as a "work" in terms of IP law, but where we would still remove > them if the person who added them were to ask us to do it. For these, I > think the "opt-out" mechanism is morally acceptable.
And of course we are using the same rules for taking and giving, or? Same amounts of data we consider non-copyrightable and keep therefore in the database can be taken out from the new ODbl-OSM database as if they were PD? And even store masses of separate extracts into one database because that's what we would do ourselves? _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
