Hi, On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 13:48:24 +0000 Dermot McNally <derm...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. Agreeing mapper maps the restaurant and names it > 2. Non-agreeing mapper adds the cuisine tag > 3. Agreeing mapper removes the cuisine tag and sets odbl=clean. He or > she does not have enough information to assert the cuisine tag and > chooses, on balance, to lose the tag for now. > 4. Well-meaning new (therefore agreeing) mapper sees the node, notices > the cuisine tag in the history and reapplies it without having > personal knowledge to back this up. odbl=clean is still set.
To me, this is on par with "well-meaning new mapper copies data from Google believing it is ok". It is something where we have to make a good effort to explain to people that they shouldn't do it, and if it turns out somebody has misunderstood, or made a mistake, then we have to fix that. I don't see *many* people using history to look for extra features to re-animate. Bye Frederik _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
